Visit ndoz's column >>

NDOZ

I have the body of a taught young Swedish boy.
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 3; Links Seeded: 8
Member Since: 4/2006Last Seen: 10/13/2009

CNN.com - 9/11 Pentagon video goes public for first time - May 16, 2006

News Type: Event — Seeded on Tue May 16, 2006 2:11 PM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: CNN
, ,
Seeded by ndoz
advertisement

Published to:

Related Articles
US 'releases 9/11 Pentagon tape'BBC NewsTue May 166Comments
US releases 9/11 Pentagon videoBBC NewsTue May 160Comments
Pentagon Releases 9/11 Security VideoAssociated PressTue May 16163Comments
What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
8.4
3.3
{"commentId":126641,"authorDomain":"dailyritual"}
Mike74

That is by far the worst video I ever saw. At point during this video can you actually see a commercial plane hitting the Pentagon. There is only a small (really) blurry object. This doesn't prove anything and not to sound like a conspiracist but come on. That's what they have to release to the public. Where are the other videos from the Gas station and the hotel which would have had a wider view of the horizon which would have allowed for you probably actually see an airplane

{"commentId":126641,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"dailyritual"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Tue May 16, 2006 4:34 PM EDT
{"commentId":127018,"authorDomain":"josephcotton"}
Joseph Cotton
Where are the other videos from the Gas station and the hotel which would have had a wider view of the horizon which would have allowed for you probably actually see an airplane

Where are they indeed. This video doesn't prove a thing except that the government is still concealing the truth.

{"commentId":127018,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"josephcotton"}
  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Tue May 16, 2006 8:59 PM EDT
{"commentId":127336,"authorDomain":"comsen"}
ComSen

What about eye witness accounts of the plane hitting the pentegone?

{"commentId":127336,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"comsen"}
    #1.2 - Wed May 17, 2006 8:17 AM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":126672,"authorDomain":"basilbub"}
    basilbub

    The object in the videos *appears* much too small to be a jumbo jet.......I wish the videos had a better sense of scale so we could approximate the size of the object more accurately.

    {"commentId":126672,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"basilbub"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Tue May 16, 2006 4:50 PM EDT
    {"commentId":127176,"authorDomain":"regbarc"}
    RegBarc

    Oh my God.

    A 757 isn't a jumbo jet.

    That's the 3rd time today I've had to assert this.

    {"commentId":127176,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"regbarc"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Wed May 17, 2006 12:03 AM EDT
    {"commentId":128276,"authorDomain":"basilbub"}
    basilbub

    OH ! OKAY!

    Let's call it a "Jetliner" or a "large passenger jet."

    Makes all the difference in the world, right?

    Mr. Wordsmith.

    Here, I'll change my previous comment: "The object in the videos *appears* much too small to be a large airliner."

    Happy?

    {"commentId":128276,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"basilbub"}
    • 2 votes
    #2.2 - Wed May 17, 2006 10:02 PM EDT
    {"commentId":128283,"authorDomain":"regbarc"}
    RegBarc

    If you can't properly refer to the aircraft (a jumbo jet is a 747, significantly larger), then everything you say about the conspiracy theory looks like it's coming from someone not educated to know the difference between the two aircraft.

    {"commentId":128283,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"regbarc"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.3 - Wed May 17, 2006 10:09 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":126690,"authorDomain":"keld"}
    Keld Bach

    What a flop!

    {"commentId":126690,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"keld"}
    • 5 votes
    Reply#3 - Tue May 16, 2006 5:00 PM EDT
    {"commentId":126770,"authorDomain":"sphereboy"}
    sphereboy

    bunch of horse maneur. Bush is really trying for some positive, but this is by far pointless. Why don't they release the videos from the hotels surrounding the area, or from the gas station that had surveillence cameras? Wouldn't be surprising that Bin Laden is caught in the next few months.

    {"commentId":126770,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"sphereboy"}
    • 4 votes
    Reply#4 - Tue May 16, 2006 5:52 PM EDT
    {"commentId":126793,"authorDomain":"keld"}
    Keld Bach

    Bin Laden... That bin Laden?

    {"commentId":126793,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"keld"}
    • 1 vote
    #4.1 - Tue May 16, 2006 6:05 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":126808,"authorDomain":"climenole"}
    climenole

    We're waiting 5 years for this !

    I watched carefully the videos of U.S. Department of Defense Official Website many times.
    I see NO commercial airplane : nothings. Or, to be more accurate, nothings more that is
    already in video like "Loose Change".

    I know that conspiracy theories are hard to believed but did the Department of Defence expect to convince anybody with this ?

    :-(

    {"commentId":126808,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"climenole"}
    • 4 votes
    Reply#5 - Tue May 16, 2006 6:11 PM EDT
    {"commentId":127339,"authorDomain":"comsen"}
    ComSen
    I know that conspiracy theories are hard to believed but did the Department of Defence expect to convince anybody with this ?

    Since Judicial Watch requested the video, they would be the ones that expected to convince others with the video.

    {"commentId":127339,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"comsen"}
      #5.1 - Wed May 17, 2006 8:19 AM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":126834,"authorDomain":"keld"}
      Keld Bach

      The videos can be seen at the Judicial Watch website as well. I'm a little disappointed over this statement by the JW president:

      ... we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77.

      I think it'll have just the opposite effect...

      {"commentId":126834,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"keld"}
      • 5 votes
      Reply#6 - Tue May 16, 2006 6:26 PM EDT
      {"commentId":126932,"authorDomain":"climenole"}
      climenole

      Thank you Keld Bach for the link to Judicial Watch.

      :)

      {"commentId":126932,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"climenole"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#7 - Tue May 16, 2006 7:53 PM EDT
      {"commentId":127177,"authorDomain":"d3rKommissar"}
      d3rKommissar

      no, come on. There's airplane wreckage in the building. Give it a rest.

      {"commentId":127177,"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596","authorDomain":"d3rKommissar"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#8 - Wed May 17, 2006 12:05 AM EDT
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"26522","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"26522","contentId":"198596"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking
      Back To Top | Front Page